10 Books That Screwed Up The World Pdf
Some of his points are fine, but most of the books are taken without a clear understanding of their time and context. Wiker estimates that in total these amoral philosophies as expounded in these infernal books have led to the demise of hundreds of millions of innocent souls. From these ten infamous books Dr. This book is great for doing just that. Honesty, Fairness, Charity, Chastity and all around morality in doing what is right, byq28e200 datasheet pdf are all things that humanity needs more of.
10 Books That Screwed Up the World
Or the poor people who happened to meet the crusaders. Justifying everything in the name of science is a recurring theme and selling your work by good prose and story telling is another. Machiavelli gets the ball rolling by counseling the prince to shed all moral and religious scruples. Wiker continuously sneers at anything outside the conservative Christian framework. Highly, highly recommended.
He doesn't seem to realize that you can be moral and not believe in God. Rousseu and Nitzche both agreed that, even though they were mainly anti religion, a society could not function without religion. The point of the cogito is not to establish that one exists, but to establish an indubitable proposition from which to build a foundation of knowledge. Anyone who can accept the truth.
Wiker equates atheism with immorality, even evil. If you aren't, you are more likely to think he is an idiot. But one could also argue as this author has, that a total disregard for good vs. Open Preview See a Problem? Quite a few people hated it giving it only one star, and a few admitted that they were so upset they never finished it.
Because Morality aka Religion is filled with love and need to take care of each other. My sense perceptions might be wrong. The tone becomes more and more didactic as you go and by the end I was really, really annoyed. This author writes from a Christian perspective. The uniting theme throughout is the danger of trying to reinvent a moral code in the absence of religion, so religious texts are not given the same critique.
Wiker chose to criticize all express an atheistic worldview and a call for an end to the restraints imposed by Judaic-Christian morality. Once these major works are viewed in chronological order, it is easy to see the impact they've had on the world. Man would go bezerk, or their leaders would do it for them and lead to a moral anarchy under which only the state could construct a semblance of order.
We also come to know a substance by means of its modes. Post moderns tend to project more than moderns do, so you can make the argument that they understand consequences less and are more aproduct of modern thinking. For Descartes, only substance exists. But I admire how Wiker takes atheism to its nasty ends.
Also, a lot of bad things have also happened because of the influence of the Bible, b I started this audio thinking it was going to be a kind of funny analysis of some classic, influential books. Each particular thought is a mode of thought itself. An idea of this sort is a confused idea. Wiker's delivery is devastating and direct.
To do otherwise makes as much sense as picking up a bible and complaining about all the talk about God. As a Christian, I believe this author is the exact kind of person who gives Christians a bad name. Any idea that is part of another idea or shared with another idea is not a distinct perception. Without the authority of God, an extremely small minority of atheists would survive with their morality in tact after that. This eliminates sense perceptions from being clear perceptions, since ideas generated from the senses are obscure.
Humans will latch onto philosophies if it excuses their behavior, or makes them feel good. This is one of the most idiotic books I've ever read. Only what is real can be known, what can be known is substance.
One of my favorite passages in the chapter on John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism. He could have posited how the wor I was greatly turned off when he mentioned Lenin's atheism as if it was the cause of his really bad decisions.
Don't take my word for it. Mr Wiker also used the Evolution as the reason for Hitler, abortion and communism.
Yet, Descartes realizes that there is one proposition whose truth is indubitable-I am thinking, therefore I am. Wiker argues that each of these malignant books screwed up the world because they essentially denied the reality of human sin that is inherent to the human condition. Now if he had tried to document the Bible's positive or negative impact on the world, he might have had some credentials.
Still another is the libertine branch. Disturbingly I can also see the allure of the clinical logic behind some of them, and see how these ideas appear in conservative and liberal argume What an intriguing book. They were the kind of self-assured chaps who took the fruits of centuries of Christian moral formation for granted even as they cheerfully chopped down the tree that had borne them.
It is his conviction that though these books are evil, they should not be burned but should rather be read, understood, and critiqued. This had the potential for such an interesting discussion. Reading the book was a learning experience and I don't feel I wasted my time. Two people were so incensed that they said they wanted to physically harm the author.
It's not very often that a book makes me want to go out and commit physical violence on the author, but this book definitely takes the cake. These are their evil opposites.
In any case, there was a pattern of thinkers reimagining the origins of human society in order to explain the problems in our present day society, and I found this fascinating. It is actually a mini-history of bad philosophy or more specifically ideology each building on the other from Machiavelli to Kinsey and Friedan. This is for me so stupid I have trouble finding the right words to explain how stupid.
We get incomplete descriptions, more rhetorical than lexical. For example, the Prince was on Lenin's bedside table.
While we all easily condemn Hitler, I hadn't realized how much he was a product of the thinkers that had gone before them and how much the ideas that influenced him still influence thinkers today! It really started to feel like just anti-atheist propaganda. That's a shame, because nonbelievers are perfectly capable of reconsidering the negative effects of many of these philosophical viewpoints if they aren't alienated by its presentation. But if you do, I recommend it as highly as I can. This book does a very good job of shedding light on the devilish plans the Progressives in politics have for this country.
Even though I am finished reading it, I intend to keep it handy so I can continue to ponder some of the more interesting bits and continue to digest the whole progression of thought. If you don't, well, don't say I didn't warn you! From there you get the authoritative philosophies of hard communism and fascism. Once I started it, I didn't want to stop until I completed all of it. At least I think so Of course, this book is not pro-atheist and from a Christian perspective.
- Los bandidos del rio frio manuel payno pdf download
- Stp75nf75 pdf download
- Shiver pdf free
- Osha pdf standards download
- Ben hogan fundamentals of golf pdf
- Rig equipment pdf
- Time management worksheet pdf download
- Mekanika fluida dan hidrolika.pdf download
- Biblia para lideres de jovenes pdf
- How to convert wps files to pdf
- Asics pdf download
- Second star to the right deborah hautzig pdf download
- Cancer cervicouterino signos y sintomas pdf download
- Que es responsabilidad social corporativa pdf
- Pdf for free for windows 7
- The lost symbol pdf download
- Php tutorial pdf ebook